Nachrichten in aller Kürze
Alles zur Community
Nachrichten, die zu Ihnen kommen: Newsletter, Feeds und SMS
Alles zu unseren mobilen Angeboten: Apps, Mobilversion und SMS
Unsere Radio- und TV-Angebote
Die Zeitung im Internet: Abo, E-Paper, Anzeigen und mehr
Alles über die Redaktion von derStandard.at
Alles über Onlinewerbung, Stellenanzeigen und Immobilieninserate
Novells "Chief Technology and Strategy Officer for Open Source", Nat Friedman
During Novells Brainshare Andreas Proschofsky had the possibility to sit down with Friedman and talk about the Linux desktop, the consequences of the Microsoft agreement and the mistakes of the Hula project.
This interview is also available in a german translation.
derStandard.at: What are the most important improvements you are going to introduce with Service Pack 1 for SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop (SLED)?
Nat Friedman: Service Pack 1 really is no big feature release for us. One of the interesting things though, is the work we have done closely with customers - like the Peugeot deal - where they actually deployed SLED in their production environments, we have learned a lot from that. Resulting from that there has been lot's of interoperability work, Active Directory, Printers, cause we've seen that this was a major issue. We also did a lot of work on Microsoft Exchange support, which is significantly more mature than before now.
derStandard.at: Did you consider to do a MAPI-connector (like Outlook itself does) for Evolution instead of accessing Outlook Web Access?
Nat Friedman: We did, but MAPI is really huge and complicated, and not everything is documented properly, so this would be a lot of work. The way we do it now is using Webdav, which is much easier, cause the interface is documented. it is slower, but we think it works well enough for what people want to do.
derStandard.at: Seeing that the Groupware-Client Evolution is a major piece of the desktop, it doesn't look like Novell has too many developers left working on it, implementing new stuff.
Nat Friedman: That's not true, Evolution is handled by our Bangalore team. there is nothing at all that changed in that respect for the last 18-24 months now..
derStandard.at: But there is a certain lack of external contributors...
Nat Friedman: No, I wouldn't agree to that either. There's a couple of people working in the community and also in other companies, for instance Scalix. Sure, they are mainly doing there own backend, but while they are doing this, they also end up doing work in the core.
And there are also the people in the community who are repurposing the Evolution code for their own stuff, like the Contacts and the Dates applications which make use of the Evolution Data Server (EDS), which is great, as such things are the reason, that we split out the EDS from the Evolution Core in the first place. They might even be drafting the future user interface for Evolution by doing that, cause they are free to experiment, and if that's interesting we might eventually replace the Evolution UI with one of those.
Another example is the Tinymail-work that Philip van Hoof has been doing, as a result of which he has been doing huge performance improvements to our mail access library Camel.
derStandard.at: But most of that optimization stuff hasn't gotten upstream until now.
Nat Friedman: Well, there is a lot that hasn't cause the guy is incredibly productive, so it's difficult to take that all, but there is also a lot that has.
So all in all we've a huge 300.000-400.000 line application, we have a dozen or so engineers working on it inside Novell, and a bunch of others in the community and in other companies, so I feel pretty good about the work that is going into it.
|1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5||weiter|
Zu den Neuerungen zählt die Unterstützung der Storage Live Migration und ein Third-Party Plug-in Framework
Kommt mit Software für die Modellierung und den 3D-Druck daher
Gespaltene Meinung bei Entwicklern
Freies Unix steht zum Download bereit
Die Kommentare von Usern und Userinnen geben nicht notwendigerweise die Meinung der Redaktion wieder. Die Redaktion behält sich vor, Kommentare, welche straf- oder zivilrechtliche Normen verletzen, den guten Sitten widersprechen oder sonst dem Ansehen des Mediums zuwiderlaufen (siehe ausführliche Forenregeln), zu entfernen. Der/Die Benutzer/in kann diesfalls keine Ansprüche stellen. Weiters behält sich die derStandard.at GmbH vor, Schadenersatzansprüche geltend zu machen und strafrechtlich relevante Tatbestände zur Anzeige zu bringen.